Stardust Solutions
Stratospheric Aerosol InjectionActiveFounded 2023 · Ness Ziona, Israel · US-incorporated (Delaware) · $75M raised · ~25 employees
A for-profit startup founded by three scientists from Israel's nuclear weapons establishment, funded by defense-intelligence-connected investors, developing secret patented particles to spray into the stratosphere. They have published zero peer-reviewed research, ignored their own governance consultant, secretly lobbied Congress, and plan to begin outdoor experiments in April 2026 with no public consultation.
Outdoor Experiments Planned April 2026
Stardust plans to begin releasing their secret particles at 18km altitude starting April 2026 — with zero public consultation, zero published safety data, and no regulatory approval. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) has called this "reckless."
1.What Are They Spraying?
Stardust Solutions is developing a proprietary reflective particle for stratospheric aerosol injection — spraying particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. They claim the particles are "bio-safe," "chemically inert," and made of "components abundant in nature."
The problem: nobody outside the company knows what the particles actually are. The chemical composition is secret and patent-pending. No peer-reviewed research has been published. No external scientists can evaluate their safety claims because the data doesn't exist publicly.
Their 2023 pitch deck proposed "annually dispersing ~1 million tons of sun-reflecting particles" to create "~1% extra cloud coverage" and called it the "only technologically feasible solution" to climate change.
“They claim to have a "magic aerosol particle" but the assertion that it is "perfectly safe and inert" cannot be trusted without published findings.”
— Douglas MacMartin, Associate Professor, Cornell University
“When it comes to governance principles like transparency and public engagement — they're not adhering to any of them.”
— Shuchi Talati, Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering
“Even diamonds would alter stratospheric chemistry. Calling anything "chemically inert" in the stratosphere is nonsense.”
— David Keith, University of Chicago, founding director of Climate Systems Engineering Initiative (refused to consult for Stardust)
2.Business Model: Perpetual Government Contracts
Stardust expects nations to pay it more than a billion dollars a year to launch aircraft into the stratosphere and disperse their proprietary particles. Target customers: governments. Target deployment: as early as 2035. The revenue model is a perpetual government contract — once deployment starts, it can never stop.
This is because of termination shock: if stratospheric aerosol injection begins at scale and then stops, temperatures would spike rapidly — potentially faster than the original warming. Deployment scenarios involve continuous particle injection for hundreds of years. Any government customer is locked in forever.
A for-profit company is seeking patent protections on atmosphere-altering technology that, once deployed, creates permanent dependency on whoever holds the IP. The entire planet is affected. The question is not just scientific — it's about who gets to control the global thermostat.
“Adding business interests, profit motives, and rich investors into this situation just creates more cause for concern, complicating the ability of responsible scientists and engineers to carry out the work needed.”
— David Keith & Daniele Visioni, leading geoengineering researchers (MIT Technology Review)
“There's a massive incentive to lobby countries to use it, and that's the whole danger of having for-profit companies here.”
— Shuchi Talati, Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering
3.April 2026 ExperimentsURGENT
Stardust plans to begin "outdoor contained experiments" starting April 2026 — weeks from now. The tests would release their proprietary reflective particles inside a modified plane flying at approximately 11 miles (18 km) above sea level, in the stratosphere. They describe this as "contained" and "non-dispersive."
The tests are planned in Israel (headquarters near Tel Aviv, in Ness Ziona). The exact location has not been publicly disclosed.
- Zero public consultation conducted
- Zero published safety data
- No environmental or health impact assessment made public
- No regulatory approval process reported
- No Israeli government statement permitting or opposing the tests
- Israel is party to the Convention on Biological Diversity, which has a moratorium on geoengineering (reaffirmed at COP16)
“US-Israeli start-up Stardust Solutions plans reckless outdoor experiments of highly controversial solar geoengineering from April 2026.”
— Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
4.Secret Lobbying: The "Clerical Error"
In Q1 2025, Stardust hired Holland & Knight — a major K Street law and lobbying firm — to lobby Congress. Holland & Knight failed to publicly disclose the relationship as required by federal law.
When E&E News/Politico broke the story in November 2025, Holland & Knight spokesperson Olivia Hoch called the non-disclosure a "clerical error" and "inadvertent." The firm refused to say how much Stardust paid or what specific issues were lobbied on.
CEO Yedvab claimed they were lobbying "for oversight" of their own industry. But the company simultaneously refused to publish its particle composition, refused public consultation, and ignored its own governance consultant's recommendations.
“We're not seeking funding or discussing specific laws or regulations — we're informing members of Congress about our work and the need for appropriate and robust oversight.”
— Yanai Yedvab, CEO, Stardust Solutions
5.The Governance Consultant They Hired and Ignored
In 2024, Stardust hired Janos Pasztor — a veteran climate diplomat, former UN Assistant Secretary-General on Climate Change, and founder of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative — as an independent governance consultant. Notably, Pasztor donated his entire consulting fee to UNRWA (UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees) rather than keep it.
- Pasztor recommended: publish a public website, develop a code of conduct, increase transparency, engage stakeholders, appoint an advisory group, reach out to scientific evaluators
- Stardust's website was hidden from search engines for months
- The agreed-upon code of conduct was never published — replaced with watered-down "Guiding Principles"
- No public consultation was conducted
- No research data was published
- No advisory group was appointed
“Come on guys, this is getting embarrassing.”
— Janos Pasztor, former UN Assistant Secretary-General, on Stardust's delays in publishing governance documents
“They've ignored every recommendation from everyone and think they can turn a profit in this field.”
— Douglas MacMartin, Associate Professor, Cornell University
“The company is in violation of virtually every norm that has driven the field so far: not open about research, not open about the particle, for-profit, and pursuing IP protections.”
— Summary of scientific community criticism (Undark, MIT Technology Review)
6.International Condemnation
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) has published multiple statements condemning Stardust, calling their approach a "reckless geoengineering gamble" that "threatens to put humanity on a path of no return to perpetual dependency on this extreme technology."
CIEL points out that deployment is constrained by international customary law and prohibited under a longstanding moratorium at the Convention on Biological Diversity — which Israel is a party to. The moratorium was reaffirmed by consensus at CBD COP16 in Colombia.
Over 600 scientists worldwide have signed the Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement, calling for a halt to commercial solar geoengineering deployment. The academic community is broadly critical of for-profit SAI.
“Stardust Solutions and its investors are accelerating a reckless race that threatens to put humanity on a path of no return to perpetual dependency on this extreme technology.”
— Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
“Who gets to control the global thermostat?”
— CIEL, on the governance implications of commercial SAI
7.The Founders: From Nuclear Weapons to Geoengineering
All three Stardust co-founders come from Israel's nuclear weapons establishment — specifically the Negev Nuclear Research Center (Dimona), Israel's most classified nuclear facility, and the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC).
The Negev Nuclear Research Center was built in 1958 with French assistance under secret agreements. While officially for "general research purposes," its actual purpose is the production of nuclear materials for Israel's estimated 80-400 nuclear weapons. Israel maintains a policy of "strategic ambiguity" and has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. When U.S. inspectors visited, Israel reportedly installed temporary false walls and other concealment devices — the inspectors told the U.S. government their inspections were "useless."
This institutional background is essential context. These are not people who come from a culture of open science — they come from a culture of extreme secrecy by design. The opacity of Stardust is not an accident.
8.The Money Behind Stardust
Stardust has raised $75 million in under three years — more than double any other geoengineering company. Their $60M Series A (October 2025) is the largest geoengineering investment in history. They raise at roughly $30M/year compared to an industry average of $7-10M/year.
The seed round ($15M, early 2024) came primarily from AWZ Ventures — a Canadian-Israeli VC with a unique partnership with MAFAT, the Israeli Ministry of Defense's R&D arm. AWZ's advisory board includes a former Mossad Chief of Intelligence, a former Unit 8200 commander, and former directors of the CIA, FBI, and MI5. Their first fund ($82.5M) was a joint fund with the Israeli Ministry of Defence.
When confronted about defense connections, Stardust stated it "receives no funding from the Israeli Defense Ministry" and "has no connection to the Israeli government." This is technically about direct government funding — AWZ's relationship with the Defense Ministry is acknowledged on AWZ's own website.
9. Founder Profiles
All three co-founders come from the Negev Nuclear Research Center (Dimona) and/or the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. None have published peer-reviewed research on geoengineering.
Yanai Yedvab
CEO & Co-FounderBackground
- PhD in Experimental Nuclear Physics (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)
- MPA from Harvard Kennedy School
- 30+ years in Israeli national labs and governmental R&D
- Head of the Physics Division at the Negev Nuclear Research Center (Dimona)
- Deputy Chief Research Scientist at IAEC (2011-2015)
- Previously CTO of Aleph8
Geoengineering Publications
None. Zero peer-reviewed papers on geoengineering, aerosols, or atmospheric science.
Notable
Rejected Undark's "many requests for an interview." Required NDAs from scientists reviewing Stardust's work. Daniele Visioni (Cornell) refused to sign and couldn't get answers.
Amyad Spector
CPO & Co-FounderBackground
- Advanced degree under Eli Waxman's supervision at the Weizmann Institute
- Physics researcher at the Negev Nuclear Research Center (Dimona)
- Nearly a decade on unspecified Israeli government R&D projects
- Worked on Israel's COVID-19 pandemic response
Geoengineering Publications
None known.
Notable
By far the least visible co-founder — zero interviews, zero public quotes in any article. Consistent with a career in classified Israeli defense/nuclear R&D.
Eli Waxman
Lead Scientist & Co-FounderBackground
- Professor of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science
- Research Physicist at the Negev Nuclear Research Center (Dimona) during graduate studies
- Former Chief Scientist of IAEC (2013-2015)
- Head of National Security Council Expert Committee on COVID-19 (2020)
- 170 refereed papers, 23,538 citations, h-index 69
- Head researcher on ULTRASAT satellite mission (Israel's first space telescope, NASA launch 2026)
Geoengineering Publications
None. Despite being the most prolific academic of the three, Waxman has published zero peer-reviewed papers on geoengineering, aerosols, or atmospheric science. Entire publication record is in astrophysics.
Notable
His academic credibility lends legitimacy to Stardust. Overlapped with Yedvab at IAEC from 2013-2015 — likely where they deepened their working relationship.
10. Timeline
2023
Stardust Solutions founded. Operates in stealth mode.
Early 2024
$15M seed round from AWZ Ventures (Israeli defense-VC) + SolarEdge.
April 2024
First public mention (NPR report). Seed round disclosed.
Sept 2024
CEO Yedvab presents at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO.
Q1 2025
Holland & Knight hired to lobby Congress. Fails to disclose as required by law.
Feb 2025
Bare-bones website launched — previously hidden from search engines.
March 2025
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists publishes founder investigation.
Oct 2025
$60M Series A announced — largest geoengineering investment in history. Lowercarbon Capital (Sacca) leads.
Nov 2025
E&E News/Politico exposes secret lobbying. Holland & Knight blames "clerical error."
Dec 2025
First major interviews (MIT Technology Review, Washington Post).
April 2026
Planned outdoor experiments — release of secret particles at 18km altitude. No public consultation.
The Bottom Line
A for-profit company founded by nuclear weapons scientists, funded by defense-intelligence-connected investors, wants to spray a secret patented substance into the stratosphere — affecting every person on the planet — and won't tell anyone what it is. They've published zero research, ignored their own governance consultant, secretly lobbied Congress, and plan to begin experiments in weeks with no public consultation. Over 600 scientists have called for a halt to commercial solar geoengineering. International law prohibits it. They're doing it anyway.
What you can do
Share this page. Contact your representatives. Support the legal fight.
Note: Every claim on this page is cited with its primary source. SkyLedger does not make accusations — we present documented facts from public records, government databases, court filings, and reputable journalism. We encourage readers to verify every claim independently.